That the respondent being the Secretary General, Lok Sabha is not an employee of the Central Government and thus is not entitled to invoke Section 14-C of the Act. The petitioners sought leave to defend on the following two grounds.ģ. The application for leave o defend was supported by two separate affidavits of she two petitioners. Summons of this petition were duty service on the petitioners and in responds to the same, the petitioners filed two separate applications for leave to defend. 1 for the residence of petitioner no 2 The respondent who was working as Secretary General, Lok Sabha filed a petition for eviction under Section 14-C read with Section 25-B of the Act for eviction of the petitioners on the ground that the require the premises for his own residence after his retirement in May 1989. D-298 Sarvodya Enclave, New Delhi to petitioner No. The respondent let out the first floor premises of property No. Sunanda Bhandare, J.:- This revision petition under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is directed against the judgment and order of the Rent Controller, Delhi dated 1-6-1989 whereby the application for leave to defend filed by the petitioners was dismissed.Ģ.
0 kommentar(er)
